This week we dive into the complexities of free trade, the role of tariffs, and their far-reaching implications on national security and global supply chains. Our distinguished guest, Dr. Meg Reiss, brings her unparalleled expertise to this nuanced conversation. A PhD alum of the LBJ School of Public Affairs, former national security advisor to Senator Mitt Romney, and now founder of SolidIntel, Dr. Reiss is transforming how artificial intelligence navigates global trade.
Dr. Reiss articulates the economic and diplomatic merits of free trade: “Free trade minimizes burdens on producers and consumers, creating integrated supply chains that foster stronger ties between nations.” However, she doesn’t shy away from its downsides, noting that “manufacturing job losses often blamed on free trade would have likely occurred due to automation and other forces.”
When asked about free trade's national security dimension, she cautions: “China’s weaponization of trade—through tactics like industry subsidies and supply chain manipulation—poses a serious threat.” Dr. Reiss underscores the need for strategic action, not sweeping tariffs: “Tariffs are a blunt instrument that often punish domestic consumers more than foreign adversaries.”
A recurring theme is the potential misuse of tariffs as a negotiation strategy rather than a well-thought-out policy. Dr. Reiss critiques such tactics because while they could serve as leverage, they also risk damaging relationships with allies like Mexico and Canada—relationships crucial to counterbalancing adversaries like China.
Historically, the U.S. has used tariffs to protect domestic industries, but as Dr. Reiss explains, “Our supply chains are now so globally integrated that high tariffs disrupt domestic production just as much as they hurt foreign competitors.” In her call to action, Dr. Reiss emphasizes the power of informed citizen engagement: “Smart, thoughtful advocacy can influence policymakers. It’s vital to communicate the real-world impact of trade policies—whether as business owners or concerned citizens.”
Zachary reflects on how young people view globalization: “The internet has made borders feel less meaningful. This gives our generation a uniquely international perspective, which can drive movements for freer trade and stronger global connections.” As our discussion draws to a close, Dr. Reiss connects free trade to broader human rights goals: “Trade agreements can push countries to improve human rights and governance standards. When negotiated strategically, they benefit all parties involved.” Her closing thought is a hopeful one: “We created institutions like the WTO and NATO to safeguard our interests. Instead of undermining them, we should leverage and reform these tools for a more stable and interconnected world.”
Join us next time as we continue to explore the critical issues shaping our democracy. Until then, let’s remember Dr. Reiss’s powerful reminder: “Thoughtful participation isn’t just important—it’s transformative.”
Share this post